The archive belongs to the people who lived it


The Communard



The Fed raised interest rates for the first time since 2023, defying Trump’s demand for cuts

Kevin Warsh, the chair Trump appointed, voted with the rest of the Fed to raise rates to fight inflation that’s partly driven by the administration’s own war footing.

Official portrait of Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh

The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate on Wednesday for the first time since 2023, lifting the target range by a quarter point to 3.75 to 4 percent. The Federal Open Market Committee voted 12-0, with no dissents recorded, defying weeks of public pressure from President Trump to cut rates instead.

The move is the first hike under Kevin Warsh, the Fed chair Trump himself nominated and the Senate confirmed by a 54-45 vote in May, the closest confirmation margin for a Fed chair in the modern era. Warsh took over after Jerome Powell’s term as chair expired; Powell remains on the Fed’s Board of Governors, where his term as a governor runs until January 2028.

Warsh framed the increase as overdue. “The plain fact is that inflation is too high and has been for too long,” he said, adding that “today’s policy action will support a timelier return” to the Fed’s 2 percent inflation target. He argued price stability would ultimately help “the least well off” by allowing workers to see “real take-home pay increases” rather than raises eaten up by rising prices.

The Fed’s own materials point to supply shocks, particularly in energy, as a driver of the inflation it is now fighting. Oil prices have traded above $100 a barrel amid the ongoing conflict with Iran, a war the U.S. House voted this week to formally end for a third time. The Fed is raising the cost of borrowing for everyone with a mortgage, a car loan, or a credit card balance to counter price pressure that originates, in significant part, from a war footing set by the White House itself.

Trump did not take the decision quietly. “LOWER THE INTEREST RATES FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND FAST!” he wrote on Truth Social, arguing rates “should be 1 percent, or less, because we are the Best Credit in the World, BY FAR,” and that “we are ‘carrying’ almost every country in the World, and that cannot go on any longer.” The White House was more measured but still critical: deputy press secretary Kush Desai called the hike “a rather unfortunate decision” that lacked compelling economic justification.

The Fed’s projections suggest this is not the end of the tightening cycle. Most officials on the committee now expect one more quarter-point increase before the year is out, and futures markets are pricing roughly even odds of another hike in October. That means borrowing costs for households and small businesses are likely headed higher still, even as the White House keeps demanding the opposite.

Warsh’s vote against the president who installed him is being read in Washington as a test of the Fed’s independence from the executive branch, and on that narrow question, the central bank held. But institutional independence from political pressure is not the same thing as independence from the cost falling on ordinary borrowers. The Fed is treating the inflation as a demand-side problem to be solved with higher rates, when a real driver of it sits in the White House’s own foreign policy.

Whichever reading wins out, the people financing the fight are not the ones setting interest rates or ordering airstrikes. Renters refinancing nothing, workers carrying credit card debt, and small businesses paying more for a line of credit absorb the consequences of a war they didn’t choose and a rate decision they didn’t vote on, while the two men arguing about it in public, a president and the chair he appointed, both keep their jobs regardless of how it turns out.